Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Alloy question???? (Read 29003 times)
Marsh
Ex Member


Re: Alloy question????
Reply #15 - Jul 1st, 2004 at 3:43pm
Print Post  
Pete, I agree with your observation and would like to postualte a point you reminded me of. Perhaps BP has different requiremants that smokless due to the way it creates the gas for projecting the bullet.
Might BP produce more obturation than smokless? Does this matter?
Marsh
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PETE
Ex Member


Re: Alloy question????
Reply #16 - Jul 1st, 2004 at 11:29pm
Print Post  
Marsh,
  This thing about BP causing more obduration than smokeless seems to be pretty well excepted. I'm going to say I'm not to sure. Looking at pressure curves of both powders they don't seem all that far apart where it counts..... At ignition.

  I don't ever recall seeing an experiment where bore sized bullets were shot into a sawdust box with both black and smokeless to see if both expand the bullet to groove size. We know black will, but will smokeless? Interesting thought!

  Getting on a roll here!  Smiley

  Personally I could never figure out why some people seem to think that a bore sized bullet is as accurate as a bullet slightly over groove size. A bore size bullet has to obdurate to fill the grooves and seal off the powder gases, and in so doing what guarantee is there that it will bump up evenly? In the old days there were reasons for using bore sized bullets, but from all the target shooting articles I've seen it appears as tho they used bullets of groove size.

  A bullet, for best accuracy, has to fit the bore properly and be hard enuf so that the shock of ignition doesn't completely pass thru the bullet and deform the nose. This would apply whether the powder was black or smokeless. So whether black or smokeless produces more obduration is kind of moot since a proper sized bullet will actually size down slightly, unless of course it's breech seated. But even then we only seat the bullet out so that it engraves to about halfway into the bottom band so some of it will be sized down.

  Your thoughts!?

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Alloy question????
Reply #17 - Jul 2nd, 2004 at 9:27am
Print Post  
Pete 
My coments on antimony were made asumeing that we were talking about schuetzen plain base lead shooting. Once that you get into CBA style shooting and using tri alloys you also put them little copper pantys on the back. The soft copper in the gas checks has the ductility that the lino and harder alloys don't. Thats why they are there. None of those CBA shooters that are shooting 1800 FPS + are shooting plain base that I know of. 
Where the damage is done is where the lands displace metal as it cuts into the bullet. If that metal crumbles at the base accuracy will suffer. That is why the ductility factor is important.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PETE
Ex Member


Re: Alloy question????
Reply #18 - Jul 2nd, 2004 at 5:19pm
Print Post  
40_Rod,
  In your message you started a new paragraph with the comment "However on the subject of Antimony" when you mentioned Antimony so I figured that you were delving into another area of cast bullet alloying.

  I will agree that alloys with Antimony in them MIGHT not be applicable for Schuezten. Haven't tried that but have shot a lot of mono and Lino bullets that were paper patched, as I mentioned in my reply to Marsh. Possibly this might protect the base of the bullets in such a manner that the edge of the base won't "chip", but I doubt it.

  I'll stand by my assessment of your "test" of Lino bullets.

  I also don't know of anyone having done experiments with Lino bullets in plain base bullets, but have shot Lino in gas checked bullets without the gas checks with some success. Possibly someone ought to try shooting Lino PB bullets. Never know what might happen. Wouldn't recommend it in an old original soft steel barrel, but there are plenty of Schuetzen barrels out there of modern steels that would handle it.

  Plus maybe cranking the MV's up too. Some of the problem with soft PB bullets is that you can't get the MV's up to where they might be able to handle conditions better. Don't know of any rule says we have to use tin/Lead alloys, and no rule limiting MV. Might be time to think outside the box!

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint